How Italy’s 2026 reform reflects a wider recalibration of European tax-efficient residency frameworks and reshapes country-choice decisions for internationally mobile individuals
Italy’s decision to raise its lump sum tax regime to €300,000 per annum for new residents marks a notable shift in the European environment for high-net-worth individuals considering relocation or assessing European tax residency options. While existing beneficiaries remain protected, the higher entry threshold reflects a broader European trend towards recalibrating tax-efficient residency systems in favour of sustainability, predictability, and political durability. As a result, HNWIs and family offices are increasingly focusing on rules-based frameworks that avoid worldwide taxation and allow long-term planning, rather than relying on high-cost, fixed-charge models.
Italy’s lump sum tax regime, originally introduced in 2017 at €100,000 per annum, provides for a fixed substitute tax on foreign-source income and gains for individuals who become tax resident in Italy after a qualifying non-residence period. The framework was later amended, with the flat tax increased to €200,000 for new entrants, and has now been further revised under Italy’s 2026 Budget Law.
Under the revised rules, the increased €300,000 flat tax applies to individuals establishing Italian tax residence from 1 January 2026. Individuals who opted into the tax status prior to that date remain subject to the flat tax applicable at the time of entry, provided the conditions of the regime continue to be met. The annual flat tax applicable to qualifying family members has also been increased, from €25,000 to €50,000 per family member.
The increase in the Italian flat tax threshold is expected to be a relevant factor for internationally mobile individuals assessing European tax residency options. Several jurisdictions continue to offer alternative preferential tax frameworks, including non-domiciled regimes and special tax status arrangements.
In this context, jurisdictions such as Malta, which operates a long-standing non-dom tax system,, with its lump sum taxation based on expenditure, and Greece, which offers a special tax regime for foreign residents, remain part of the broader European landscape for cross-border residency planning.
As preferential tax regimes across Europe continue to evolve, individuals considering relocation may need to reassess their residency planning strategies in light of both cost increases and structural differences between jurisdictions.










